For patients living with HIV, the added burden of managing hypertension can create a perfect storm of health and economic challenges. A recent study sheds light on the substantial out-of-pocket costs borne by patients in South Africa participating in the MOPHADHIV trial, a trial designed to evaluate the integration of hypertension screening and management into existing HIV care programs. The findings expose a stark reality: managing co-morbidities significantly strains already vulnerable populations, demanding urgent attention from policymakers and healthcare funders.
The question isn't just about clinical efficacy; it's about financial sustainability for the patients themselves. If we fail to address the economic barriers, treatment adherence crumbles, and public health investments are undermined. This is a systemic problem requiring systemic solutions.
Clinical Key Takeaways
lightbulb
- The PivotIntegrating hypertension management into existing HIV programs isn't just clinically sound- it's a critical policy lever to reduce patient financial toxicity.
- The DataMedian monthly out-of-pocket expenditure was $14.10 (IQR $6.13-$29.19), representing a significant portion of patients' disposable income.
- The ActionAdvocate for policy changes that prioritize funding for integrated NCD management within HIV programs, focusing on reducing or eliminating patient co-pays.
Background
The global fight against HIV has seen remarkable progress, transforming a once-fatal illness into a manageable chronic condition. However, this success brings new challenges, particularly the rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like hypertension among people living with HIV. This co-morbidity places a dual burden on patients and healthcare systems alike.
Addressing this requires a paradigm shift: integrating NCD care into existing HIV programs. It’s a logical step, leveraging established infrastructure and patient relationships. However, simply adding services isn't enough. We need to understand the economic impact on patients- the out-of-pocket costs, the transportation expenses, the lost wages- and design policies that mitigate these burdens. If patients can't afford care, adherence plummets, and all the clinical innovation in the world won't make a difference. This shift is not explicitly mentioned in the WHO guidelines for HIV management, which primarily focus on ART therapy and opportunistic infection prevention, highlighting a gap in current global health strategies.
Study Details
The study in question, focusing on participants in the MOPHADHIV trial, examined the economic burden of HIV and hypertension co-management in South Africa. Researchers meticulously tracked patient costs, including medication co-pays, transportation to clinics, and consultation fees. They then analyzed the determinants of out-of-pocket expenditure, seeking to identify the factors that drive up costs for patients.
The results are sobering. Patients faced significant out-of-pocket expenses, even within a trial setting where some services were subsidized. The median monthly expenditure was $14.10 (IQR $6.13-$29.19). While this might seem modest in high-income countries, it represents a substantial proportion of disposable income for many South Africans living with HIV. Factors associated with higher costs included more frequent clinic visits and the need for additional diagnostic tests. These findings underscore the urgent need for cost-effective, integrated care models that minimize patient financial strain.
The Catch
While this study provides valuable insights, it's crucial to acknowledge its limitations. The analysis is based on data from a clinical trial, which may not fully reflect real-world conditions. Trial participants often receive more intensive monitoring and support than patients in routine care, potentially underestimating the true economic burden. Furthermore, the sample size, while adequate, could be larger to enhance the generalizability of the findings. The study also relies on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias.
Additionally, it is funded by multiple organizations, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). While this funding is essential for research, it is important to acknowledge that these organizations may have vested interests in the findings.
Policy Implications
The implications of this study extend far beyond the individual patient. They speak to the sustainability of national health insurance schemes and the overall efficiency of healthcare delivery. Integrating NCD care into HIV programs isn't just a clinical imperative; it's an economic one. By streamlining services, reducing redundant visits, and negotiating lower medication prices, we can alleviate patient financial strain and improve public health outcomes.
One critical policy lever is the elimination of patient co-pays for essential medications and services. Studies have consistently shown that co-pays disproportionately affect low-income individuals, leading to reduced adherence and poorer health outcomes. Removing these barriers can significantly improve treatment uptake and reduce the long-term costs associated with uncontrolled hypertension. Furthermore, investing in community-based healthcare workers can improve access to care in underserved areas, reducing transportation costs and improving patient engagement. The South African National Department of Health should prioritize these strategies in its efforts to combat the rising burden of NCDs among people living with HIV.
The economic burden revealed in this study directly impacts adherence. Patients who cannot afford medications or transportation are more likely to skip doses or discontinue treatment altogether, leading to poorer clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs down the line.
Workflow bottlenecks in clinics are another crucial consideration. Integrating hypertension screening and management into already-busy HIV clinics requires careful planning and resource allocation. Training healthcare workers to manage both conditions, streamlining referral pathways, and implementing electronic health records are essential steps.
LSF-8849807984 | December 2025

How to cite this article
Webb M. The crushing costs of hiv and hypertension co-management. The Life Science Feed. Published January 24, 2026. Updated January 24, 2026. Accessed January 31, 2026. .
Copyright and license
© 2026 The Life Science Feed. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all content is the property of The Life Science Feed and may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission.
Fact-Checking & AI Transparency
This summary was generated using advanced AI technology and reviewed by our editorial team for accuracy and clinical relevance.
References
- Ebrahim, S.,enger, B., Naledi, T., Levitt, N. S., & Barry, A. (2023). Economic Burden of Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Hypertension Care Among MOPHADHIV Trial Participants: Patient Costs and Determinants of Out-of-Pocket Expenditure in South Africa. *Value in Health Regional Issues, 32*, 100-107.
- World Health Organization. (2023). *Global HIV programme*. Retrieved from [https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes](https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes)
- National Department of Health, South Africa. (2020). *National Strategic Plan for HIV, TB and STIs 2017-2022*. Pretoria: NDoH.
Related Articles


The Business Case for Multidisciplinary Limb Programs in Peripheral Arterial Disease

AI-ECG for Valvular Regurgitation Screening: A Cost-Effective Strategy?

